MARine Ecosystem Models Intercomparison Project (MAREMIP)


Summary of preparation meeting held at the British Antarctic Survey, Dec 3 2007.

Present: Shubha Sathyendranath, Icarus Allen (on the phone), Erik Buitenhuis, Laurent Bopp, Meike Vogt, Yasuhiro Yamanaka, and Corinne Le Quéré (chair).

The goals of MAREMIP are to:

Scientific questions to be addressed:

Previous MIPs efforts

MAREMIP is building on two parallel efforts: the Ocean Carbon-Cycle Model Intercomparison Project (OCMIP) and the Carbon Cycle Climate Coupled Model Intercomparison Project C4MIP. OCMIP ran from about 1996 to 2004, and had four phases: OCMIP-0 compared the Princeton and Hamburg models. OCMIP-1 compared the Princeton, Hamburg, IPSL, an Hadley center models. OCMIP-2 had 11 models and a wider range of observations. OCMIP-3 (NOCES) had 7 models and focused on interannual variability.

C4MIP is ongoing since about 2000. It includes 11 models. The ocean archive from these models is far smaller than that of OCMIP. 3 of these models (IPSL, Hamburg, and NCAR) are being compared as part of the EU Carbo-Ocean project. The current focus is on primary production, export, and ocean CO2 sink.

MAREMIP will focus on the comparison of global Dynamic Green Ocean Models based on the representation of multiple Plankton Functional Types (PFTs). We will initially focus on the 1996-2007 time-period. MAREMIP will start in 2008 and hopefylly last for about 10 years. Further phases will consider ecosystem changes over paleo time-scales.

Model evaluation

Models participating in MAREMIP will be compared with a range of observations. The comparison should ideally consider model efficiency and model bias, following Allen 2007 and Doney et al. (subm. to JMS).

The comparison will include basic properties, such as:


The comparison will also include emergent properties, such as:

Simulations

In this first phase, we will focus on the 1996-2007 time period. Although we do not impose any restrictions, we recommend modelling groups to initialise their models in 1990 with nutrient observations.

In Phase II, simulations will consider:

Technical issues:

MIPs can take a lot of peoples' time. We need to be pragmatic in order not to waste too much time, and focus on things we want to do anyway. With this in mind, we propose that:

Funding:

We have currently no common source of funding. There are two possibilities to get the comparison going in 2008: we applied for support from the EU EUROCEANS project for 3 months of salary for Meike Vogt to get Phase I going; also members of the group of Yasuhiro Yamanaka would be willing to volunteer some time already in the winter. We also have a bit of funding secured to meet in October 2008.

To get the effort going, a small group composed of Meike Vogt, Yasuhiro Yamanaka and Corinne Le Quéré will meet as soon as the Euroceans's results are out and decide who does what. If other groups would like to provide human time in 2008, please let Corinne know so we can co-ordinate the efforts.

For the long term effort, we need to explore future sources of funding.
Corinne will explore the possibility of including EU funding in Greencycles-II project.
Corinne will explore NERC standard or consortium grant.
Travel money from international projects may be available (e.g. GCP, AIMES, IMBER, SOLAS).